Tom Lane wrote:
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If someone's going to commit to putting effort into improving the
planner then that's wonderful. But I can't recall any significant
planner improvements since min/max (which I'd argue was more of a bug
fix than an improvement).
Hmph. Apparently I've wasted most of the last five years.
In my opinion your on-going well thought out planner improvements are
*exactly* the approach we need to keep doing...
Cheers
Mark
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
