On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:07:43 -0400
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the time is all in index vacuuming, eh? I think what's happening
> is that the physical order of the index is degrading over time, and
> so the vacuum scan takes longer due to more seeking. Can you afford
> to do a REINDEX? If this theory is correct that should drive the
> time back down.
Tom,
You wonderful, wonderful man.
I tried a test reindex on "Allocation", and noticed a vacuum had
turbo-charged... then reindexed the whole db, did a vacuum, and lo! The
whole db had turbo-charged :)
When I say 'turbo-charged', I mean it. The vacuum times have dropped to
20% of what we were seeing even before it 'got much slower a
couple of days ago.'
It sucks that the new reindex code is only in 8.2, but now that I know
this is an issue in 8.1 I can plan for it.
Thanks so much :)
Cheers,
Gavin.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
