Am Freitag, den 03.11.2006, 14:38 +0000 schrieb Richard Huxton: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> If you can keep your numbers of clients down below the critical > >> level, you should find the overall workload is fine. > > > > We have at about 600 connections. Is this a case to use a connection > > pool (pg_pool) system? > > Possibly - that should help. I'm assuming that most of your queries are > very short, so you could probably get that figure down a lot lower. > You'll keep the same amount of queries running through the system, just > queue them up. that have Ah, yes, now that you mention, avoid running many queries with a similiar timing behaviour, PG8 seems to have a lock design that's very bad for the memory architecture of the Xeons.
So running SELECT * FROM table WHERE id=1234567890; from 600 clients in parallel can be quite bad than say a complicated 6-way join :( Andreas > > > And why this happens only with 8.0 and 8.1 and not with the 7.4? > > Not sure. Maybe 8.x is making more intensive use of your memory, > possibly with a change in your plans. >
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
