Tom Lane wrote:
Arjen van der Meijden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'll run another analyze on the database to see if that makes any
difference, but after that I'm not sure what to check first to figure
out where things go wrong?
Look for changes in plans?
Yeah, there are a few number of small changes in plans and costs
estimated. I've a large list of queries executed against both databases,
and I haven't seen any differences in row-estimates, so the analyze's
have yielded similar enough results.
I'm not sure whether some of the changes are for better or worse, you
can probably spot that a bit faster than I can. I saw a few index scans
replaced by seq scans (on small tables), all index scans seem to have
doubled in cost? And I saw a few bitmap scans in stead of normal index
scans and more such small changes. But not so small if you execute a
hundreds of thousands of those queries.
Since I'd rather not send the entire list of queries to the entire
world, is it OK to send both explain analyze-files to you off list?
Best regards,
Arjen
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
