Hey Jim - Thanks for the feedback. The server has dual Xeons with HyperThreading enabled - so perhaps I should try disabling it. How much performance boost have you seen by disabling it? Of course, the bottleneck in my case is more on the I/O or RAM side, not the CPU side.
Jeremy Haile On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:15:26 -0600, "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:24:24PM -0500, Jeremy Haile wrote: > > I am sure that this has been discussed before, but I can't seem to find > > any recent posts. (I am running PostgreSQL 8.2) > > > > I have always ran PostgreSQL on Linux in the past, but the company I am > > currently working for uses Windows on all of their servers. I don't > > have the luxury right now of running my own benchmarks on the two OSes, > > but wanted to know if anyone else has done a performance comparison. Is > > there any significant differences? > > One thing to consider... I've seen a case or two where pgbench running > on windows with HyperThreading enabled was actually faster than with it > turned off. (General experience has been that HT hurts PostgreSQL). I > suspect that the windows kernel may have features that allow it to > better utilize HT than linux. > > Of course if you don't have HT... it doesn't matter. :) > -- > Jim Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
