Arjen van der Meijden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PS, In case any of the planner-hackers are reading, here are the plans 
> of the first two queries, just to see if something can be done to 
> decrease the differences between them.

Increase work_mem?  It's not taking the hash because it thinks it won't
fit in memory ...

There is a bug here, I'd say: the rowcount estimate ought to be the same
either way.  Dunno why it's not, but will look --- I see the same
misbehavior with a toy table here.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to