Mark Stosberg wrote:
>
> I'm reading the explain analyze output correctly myself, nearly all of
> the time spent is related to the 'pets' table, but I can't see what to
> about it.
Something about typing that message jarred by brain to think to try:
VACUUM FULL pets;
VACUUM ANALYZE pets;
Now the new cube-based calculation benchmarks reliably faster. The old
lat/lon systems now benchmarks at 250ms, while the the new cube-based
code bechmarks at 100ms, over a 50% savings!
That's good enough for me.
However, I'm still interested advice on the other points I snuck into my
last message about joining with ints vs varchars and best use of partial
indexes.
Mark
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
