Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:49:14AM -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>> On 3/1/07, Shiva Sarna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I am sorry if it is a repeat question but I want to know if database
>>> performance will decrease if I increase the max-connections to 2000. At
>>> present it is 100.
>> Most certainly. Adding connections over 200 will degrade performance
>> dramatically. You should look into pgpool or connection pooling from
>> the application.
>
> Are you sure? I've heard of at least one installation which runs with
> 5000+ connections, and it works fine.
We have one that high as well and it does fine. Although I wouldn't
suggest it on less than 8.1 ;). 8.2 handles it even better since 8.2
handles >8 cores better than 8.1.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
