Rodrigo Madera wrote:
I would just like to note here that this is an example of inefficient
strategy.
We could all agree (up to a certain economical point) that Alex saved
the most expensive one thousand dollars of his life.
I don't know the financial status nor the size of your organization, but
I'm sure that you have selected the path that has cost you more.
In the future, an investment on memory for a (let's say) rather small
database should be your first attempt.
Alex may have made the correct, rational choice, given the state of accounting
at most corporations. Corporate accounting practices and the budgetary process
give different weights to cash and labor. Labor is fixed, and can be grossly
wasted without (apparently) affecting the quarterly bottom line. Cash
expenditures come directly off profits.
It's shortsighted and irrational, but nearly 100% of corporations operate this
way. You can waste a week of your time and nobody complains, but spend a
thousand dollars, and the company president is breathing down your neck.
When we answer a question on this forum, we need to understand that the person
who needs help may be under irrational, but real, constraints, and offer
appropriate advice. Sure, it's good to fight corporate stupidity, but
sometimes you just want to get the system back online.
Craig
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
