"Daniel Cristian Cruz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2007/3/28, chris smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Total runtime: 13.844 ms
>>
>> Why bother?
> Because faster could be better in a very busy system.
If you are concerned about global performance improvement, quit worrying
about this micro-detail and get yourself onto a more modern Postgres.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
