On 5-Apr-07, at 3:33 PM, John Allgood wrote:
The hard thing about running multiple postmasters is that you have
to tune
each one separate. Most of the databases I have limited the max-
connections
to 30-50 depending on the database. What would reasonable values for
effective_cache_size and random_page_cost. I think I have these
default.
Also what about kernel buffers on RHEL4.
random_page_cost should be left alone
Why do you run multiple postmasters ? I don't think this is not the
most efficient way to utilize your hardware.
Dave
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Frost
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 3:24 PM
To: John Allgood
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] High Load on Postgres 7.4.16 Server
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, John Allgood wrote:
Hello All
I sent this message to the admin list and it never got through so I
am trying the performance list.
We moved our application to a new machine last night. It is a Dell
PowerEdge 6950 2X Dual Core. AMD Opteron 8214 2.2Ghz. 8GB Memory. The
machine is running Redhat AS 4 Upd 4 and Redhat Cluster Suite. The
SAN is
an
EMC SAS connected via fibre. We are using Postgres 7.4.16. We have
recently
had some major hardware issues and replaced the hardware with
brand new
Dell
equipment. We expected a major performance increase over the previous
being
the old equipment was nearly three years old
I will try and explain how things are configured. We have 10
separate postmasters running 5 on each node. Each of the
postmasters is a
single instance of each database. Each database is separated by
division
and
also we have them separate so we can restart an postmaster with
needing to
restart all databases My largest database is about 7 GB. And the
others
run
anywhere from 100MB - 1.8GB.
The other configuration was RHEL3 and Postgres 7.4.13 and Redhat
Cluster Suite. The application seemed to run much faster on the older
equipment.
My thoughts on the issues are that I could be something with the OS
tuning. Here is what my kernel.shmmax, kernel.shmall = 1073741824. Is
there
something else that I could tune in the OS. My max_connections=35 and
shared
buffers=8192 for my largest database.
John,
Was the SAN connected to the previous machine or is it also a new
addition
with the Dell hardware? We had a fairly recent post regarding a
similar
upgrade in which the SAN ended up being the problem, so the first
thing I
would do is test the SAN with bonnie-++ and/or move your
application to use
a
local disk and test again. With 8GB of RAM, I'd probably set the
shared_buffers to at least 50000...If I remember correctly, this
was the
most
you could set it to on 7.4.x and continue benefitting from it. I'd
strongly
encourage you to upgrade to at least 8.1.8 (and possibly 8.2.3) if
you can,
as
it has much better shared memory management. You might also want
to double
check your effective_cache_size and random_page_cost to see if they
are set
to
reasonable values. Did you just copy the old postgresql.conf over?
This is the beginning of the thread I mentioned above:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-03/msg00104.php
--
Jeff Frost, Owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954
---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/746 - Release Date:
4/4/2007
1:09 PM
---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
