On Fri, 18 May 2007, Ron Mayer wrote:

Anecdotally ;-) I've found renice-ing reports to help

Let's break this down into individual parts:

1) Is there enough CPU-intensive activity in some database tasks that they can be usefully be controlled by tools like nice? Sure.

2) Is it so likely that you'll fall victim to a priority inversion problem that you shouldn't ever consider that technique? No.

3) Does the I/O scheduler in modern OSes deal with a lot more things than just the CPU? You bet.

4) Is vacuuming a challenging I/O demand?  Quite.

Add all this up, and that fact that you're satisfied with how nice has worked successfully for you doesn't have to conflict with an opinion that it's not the best approach for controlling vacuuming. I just wouldn't extrapolate your experience too far here.

--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

               http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Reply via email to