On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 02:02:40PM -0700, Mark Lewis wrote:
> PG could scan the index looking for matches first and only load the
> actual rows if it found a match, but that could only be a possible win
> if there were very few matches, because the difference in cost between a
> full index scan and a sequential scan would need to be greater than the
> cost of randomly fetching all of the matching data rows from the table
> to look up the visibility information.
> So yes it would be possible, but the odds of it being faster than a
> sequential scan are small enough to make it not very useful.
> And since it's basically impossible to know the selectivity of this kind
> of where condition, I doubt the planner would ever realistically want to
> choose that plan anyway because of its poor worst-case behavior.
What is a real life example where an intelligent and researched
database application would issue a like or ilike query as their
primary condition in a situation where they expected very high
selectivity?
Avoiding a poor worst-case behaviour for a worst-case behaviour that
won't happen doesn't seem practical.
What real life examples, that could not be implemented a better way,
would behave poorly if like/ilike looked at the index first to filter?
I don't understand... :-)
Cheers,
mark
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
