On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 19:16 +0200, PFC wrote:
>
> > Could this be because of my Cost-Based Vacuum Delay settings ?
>
> Yeah. It is supposed to slow down VACUUM so it doesn't kill your
> server,
> but it is not aware of the load. It will also slow it down if there is no
> load. That is its purpose after all ;)
> If you want fast vacuum, issue SET vacuum_cost_delay = 0; before.
Thanks, I tried it and it worked. I did not know that changing this
setting would result in such a performance drop ( I just followed an
advise I read on http://www.powerpostgresql.com/PerfList/) which
mentioned a tripling of the the execution time. Not a change from
8201819 ms to 17729 ms.
--
Groeten,
Joost Kraaijeveld
Askesis B.V.
Molukkenstraat 14
6524NB Nijmegen
tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277
fax: 024-3608416
web: www.askesis.nl
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
