Kurt Overberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... Turning off bitmap scans definitely seems
> to help things,
I really seriously doubt that. On queries like this, where each inner
scan is fetching a couple hundred rows, the small extra overhead of a
bitmap scan should easily pay for itself. I think you're looking
entirely at caching effects that allow a re-read of the same data to
go faster.
You might try running the same query plan several times in a row and
noting the lowest time, then repeat for the other query plan. This will
get you comparable fully-cached times, which I bet will be very close
to the same.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
