Gunther Mayer wrote: > On another note, autovacuum couldn't cause such issues, could it? I do > have autovacuum enabled (autovacuum=on as well as > stats_start_collector=on, stats_block_level = on and stats_row_level = > on), is there any possibility that autovacuum is not as resource > friendly as advertised?
Hmm. I am not sure where did you read that but I don't think it has ever been stated that autovacuum is resource friendly in the default configuration (I, for one, have never tried, intended or wanted to state that). I suggest tuning the autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay parameters if you want it to interfere less with your regular operation. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
