Hi Andrew
On 11-Jun-07, at 11:34 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:09:42AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
and set them to anything remotely close to 128GB.
Well, we'd give 25% of it to postgres, and the rest to the OS.
Are you quite sure that PostgreSQL's management of the buffers is
efficient with such a large one?
No, I'm not sure of this.
In the past, that wasn't the case
for relatively small buffers; with the replacement of single-pass
LRU, that has certainly changed, but I'd be surprised if anyone
tested a buffer as large as 32G.
So does anyone have experience above 32G ?
Dave
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
--George Orwell
---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
