Scott Marlowe wrote:
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:29:49PM -0400, Karl Wright wrote:
I checked the disk picture - this is a RAID disk array with 6 drives,
with a bit more than 1Tbyte total storage. 15,000 RPM. It would be
hard to get more/faster disk than that.
What kind of RAID? It's _easy_ to get faster disk that 6 drives in
RAID5, even if they're 15,000 RPM. The rotation speed is the least
of your problems in many RAID implementations.
Also, the controller means a lot. I'd rather have a 4 disk RAID-10 with
an Areca card with BBU Cache than a 16 disk RAID 5 on an adaptec (with
or without cache... :) )
Oh come on... Adaptec makes a great skeet.
Joshua D. Drake
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
