Thanks Tom and Scott...that worked for a NEW database but not on the original SLOW database...meaning - I backed up the SLOW database and restored it to a NEW database and the query ran EXTREMELY FAST :clap:
Scott - (your question - What was the size of the slow databases data store compared to the fast database? --- I am new, how do I know the size of the database (OS file size ??))...is there an sp_helpdb equivalent command?? My EXPLAINS are under a previous thread: Query is taking 5 HOURS to Complete on 8.1 version Thanks...Michelle Tom Arthurs wrote: > > smiley2211 wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I am a bit confused...I have a database which was performing very POORLY >> selecting from a view (posted earlier) on one server but extremely fast >> on >> another server... >> >> I just backed up the database from the FAST server and loaded to the SLOW >> server and it ran just as fast as it originally did...my questions are: >> >> Are STATISTICS some how saved with the database?? if so, how do I UPDATE >> view or update them? >> >> Should I backup the data \ drop the database and reload it to make it get >> new stats?? (vacuum analyze does nothing for this poor performing >> database) >> >> Thanks-a-bunch. >> > You can update statistics with the analyze or vacuum analyze command, > but I'd bet what you are seeing here is the effect of recreating the > indices that replaying a backup does. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Database-Statistics----tf4075655.html#a11585080 Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings