Arctic Toucan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -- Is there something magical about the hash aggregate estimate of 200 rows?
Yeah, it's the default :-( > Is this a bug, or some subtlety of the Postgres query planner? It's an, um, known deficiency --- the planner hasn't got any idea how to construct aggregated statistics for an inheritance tree. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster