Thanks for you help! Got a very different query plan this time, with a hash join between links and articles. At least now postgres is using both shared memory buffers and working mem, but its still completely IO bound, only getting in 5-6% CPU once in a while. I guess I can't squeeze more out of the laptop, but I also have a machine with 16GB RAM that I'll try this on next. Should I allocate tons of memory into shared buffers or into the working memory?
Thanks in advance! ----- Original Message ---- From: Jonah H. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Pavel Velikhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 7:52:58 PM Subject: Re: [PERFORM] need help with a query On 10/19/07, Pavel Velikhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am updating a big table (90M records) with data from another rather > large table (4M entries). Here is my update query: > > update links set target_size = > ( select size from articles where articles.article_id = > links.article_to) try: UPDATE links SET target_size = size FROM articles WHERE articles.article_id = links.article_to; -- Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324 EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com