Thanks for you help!

Got a very different query plan this time, with a hash join between links and 
articles. At least now postgres is using both shared memory buffers and working 
mem, but its still completely IO bound, only getting in 5-6% CPU once in a 
while. I guess I can't squeeze more out of the laptop, but I also have a 
machine with 16GB RAM that I'll try this on next. Should I allocate tons of 
memory into shared buffers or into the working memory?

Thanks in advance!

----- Original Message ----
From: Jonah H. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pavel Velikhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 7:52:58 PM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] need help with a query

On 10/19/07, Pavel Velikhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>   I am updating a big table (90M records) with data from another
 rather
> large table (4M entries). Here is my update query:
>
>     update links set target_size =
>     ( select size from articles where articles.article_id =
> links.article_to)

try:

UPDATE links
   SET target_size = size
  FROM articles
 WHERE articles.article_id = links.article_to;

-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation                | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor          | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edison, NJ 08837                        | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

---------------------------(end of
 broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to