On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Alan Hodgson wrote:
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Jeff Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, Areca ARC1261ML. Note that results were similar for an 8 drive RAID6
vs 8 drive RAID10, but I don't have those bonnie results any longer.
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
/sec %CP 14xRAID6 63G 73967 99 455162 58 164543 23 77637 99
438570 31 912.2 1 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create-------- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
-Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
%CP 16 12815 63 +++++ +++ 13041 61 12846 67 +++++ +++ 12871 59
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
/sec %CP 14xRAID10 63G 63968 92 246143 68 140634 30 77722 99
510904 36 607.8 0 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create-------- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
-Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
%CP 16 6655 16 +++++ +++ 5755 12 7259 17 +++++ +++ 5550 12
OK, impressive RAID-6 performance (not so impressive RAID-10 performance,
but that could be a filesystem issue). Note to self; try an Areca
controller in next storage server.
I believe these were both on ext3. I thought I had some XFS results available
for comparison, but I couldn't find them.
--
Jeff Frost, Owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
