> > Interestingly though, when the range in the generate_series() was
> > small enough to fit in 4 bytes of memory (e.g.
> > generate_series(1,1000000000) ), the above query completed consuming
> > only negligible amount of memory. So, it looked like the aggregate
> > computation was being pipelined with the tuples returned from
> > generate_series().
>
> It's pipelined either way. But int8 is a pass-by-reference data type,
> and it sounds like we have a memory leak for this case.
Thanks for your reply. How easy is it to fix this? Which portion of
the code should we look to change?
- John
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
