Hi Joshua, > You can use parameters such as vacuum_cost_delay to help this... see > the docs: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/runtime-config-autovacuum.html
I am checking it out. Seems to be a nice option for vacuum - but wish there was a way to change the delete priority or I will try to use the C based priority hack. > If you are truly running 8.0 and not something like 8.0.15 vacuum is > the least of your worries. Its 8.0.4. Thanks. -- Vinu -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
