On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:09 PM, jose javier parra sanchez < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's been said zillions of times on the maillist. Using a select > count(*) in postgres is slow, and probably will be slow for a long > time. So that function is not a good way to measure perfomance. > Yes, but if the data is in HDD then we can say this... but now the data is in RAM
