On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Dennis Muhlestein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those are good points. So you'd go ahead and add the pgpool in front (or > another redundancy approach, but then use raid1,5 or perhaps 10 on each > server? That's what I'd do. specificall RAID10 for small to medium drive sets used for transactional stuff, and RAID6 for very large reporting databases that are mostly read. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
