On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Howard Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This misses out the random access of the email table, turning my 27 > second query into 6 seconds.
It took less time because it retrieved a lot less data - it still has to look at the table. -- Alan -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
