Peter Schuller wrote:
> Does anyone have input on why this could be happening? The PostgreSQL
> version is 8.2.4[1]. Am I correct in that it *should* not be possible
> for this to happen?
No. VACUUM takes an exclusive lock at the end of the operation to
truncate empty pages. (If it cannot get the lock then it'll just skip
this step.) In 8.2.4 there was a bug that caused it to sleep
according to vacuum_delay during the scan to identify possibly empty
pages. This was fixed in 8.2.5:
revision 1.81.2.1
date: 2007-09-10 13:58:50 -0400; author: alvherre; state: Exp; lines: +6
-2;
Remove the vacuum_delay_point call in count_nondeletable_pages, because we
hold
an exclusive lock on the table at this point, which we want to release as
soon
as possible. This is called in the phase of lazy vacuum where we truncate
the
empty pages at the end of the table.
An alternative solution would be to lower the vacuum delay settings before
starting the truncating phase, but this doesn't work very well in autovacuum
due to the autobalancing code (which can cause other processes to change our
cost delay settings). This case could be considered in the balancing code,
but
it is simpler this way.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
