On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a PostgreSQL database on a very low-resource Xen virtual machine, > 48 MB RAM. When two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to > complete then if run in sequence. Is there perhaps a way to install > something like a query sequencer, which would process queries in a FIFO > manner, one at a time, even if a new query comes before the last one > running is finished, it would not give the new query to the server > before the one running now finishes? That would greatly improve > performance. > > Any tips in general for running PostgreSQL on such low-resource machine? > > I have: > > shared_buffers = 5MB > work_mem = 1024kB > > are these good values, or could perhaps changing something improve it a > bit? Any other parameters to look at?
Well, you're basically working on a really limited machine there. I'd set shared buffers up by 1 meg at a time and see if that helps. But you're basically looking at a very narrow problem that most people won't ever run into. Why such an incredibly limited virtual machine? Even my cell phone came with 256 meg built in two years ago. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
