2008/8/1 Matthew Wakeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I'm wrong but if this "bulk insert and delete" process is cyclical
>> then You don't need vacuum full.
>> Released tuples will fill up again with fresh data next day - after
>> regular vacuum.
>
> Yes, a regular manual vacuum will prevent the table from growing more than
> it needs to. However, a vacuum full is required to actually reduce the size
> of the table from 7.5G to 2.7G if that hasn't been done on the production
> system already.
One good possibility is use pg8.3 for fix problem. Enable
Autovacuum+HOT was won a significant performance compared with 8.2 and
minor versions. :)
Kind Regards,
--
Fernando Ike
http://www.midstorm.org/~fike/weblog
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
