As far as I can tell, it should. If it is clustered on an index on
domain, and then analysed, it should no longer have to sort on domain.
Could you post here the results of running:
select * from pg_stats where attname = 'domain';
schemaname | tablename | attname | null_frac |
avg_width | n_distinct |
most_common_vals
|
most_common_freqs
|
histogram_bounds
|
correlation
public | result | domain | 0 |
4 | 1642 |
{3491378,3213829,3316634,3013831,3062500,3242775,3290846,3171997,3412018,3454092
} |
{0.352333,0.021,0.01,0.00766667,0.00566667,0.00533333,0.00533333,0.005,0.00266667,0.00266667
} |
{3001780,3031753,3075043,3129688,3176566,3230067,3286784,3341445,3386233,3444374,3491203
} |
1
No idea what that means :)
Sounds like an awfully long time to me. Also, I think restricting it
to 280 users is probably not making it any faster.
If I hadn't restricted it to 280 users it would have run ~350days...
Thanks for your help!
moritz
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
