Tommy Gildseth wrote: > Richard Huxton wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Unfornatly, i can't update pgsql to 8.3 since it's not in debian stable. >> >> That's why backports.org was invented :-) >> Or does can't mean "not allowed to"? > > Well, running production servers from backports can be a risky > proposition too, and can land you in situations like the one discussed > in "Debian packages for Postgres 8.2" from the General list.
Well, there's a reason why "stable" is a popular choice for production servers. I must admit that I build from source for my PostgreSQL packages (because I care which version I run). I was reading one of the Perl fellows recommending the same. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
