On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Gregory Stark <st...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > "Mark Wong" <mark...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Thanks for the input. > > In a more constructive vein: > > 1) autovacuum doesn't seem to be properly tracked. It looks like you're just > tracking the autovacuum process and not the actual vacuum subprocesses > which it spawns.
Hrm, tracking just the launcher process certainly doesn't help. Are the spawned processed short lived? I take a snapshot of /proc/<pid>/io data every 60 seconds. The only thing I see named autovacuum is the launcher process. Or perhaps I can't read? Here is the raw data of the /proc/<pid>/io captures: http://207.173.203.223/~markwkm/community6/dbt2/baseline.1000.1/db/iopp.out > 2) The response time graphs would be more informative if you excluded the > ramp-up portion of the test. As it is there are big spikes at the low end > but it's not clear whether they're really part of the curve or due to > ramp-up. This is especially visible in the stock-level graph where it > throws off the whole y scale. Ok, we'll take note and see what we can do. Regards, Mark -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
