Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote: > acording to kernel folks, anticipatory scheduler is even better for dbs. > Oh well, it probably means everyone has to test it on their own at the > end of day.
In my test case, noop and deadline performed well, deadline being a little better than noop. Both anticipatory and CFQ sucked big time. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
