On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 09:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Brian Cox <brian....@ca.com> writes:
> > I changed the logic to update the table in 1M row batches. However, 
> > after 159M rows, I get:
> 
> > ERROR:  could not extend relation 1663/16385/19505: wrote only 4096 of 
> > 8192 bytes at block 7621407
> 
> You're out of disk space.
> 
> > A df run on this machine shows plenty of space:
> 
> Per-user quota restriction, perhaps?
> 
> I'm also wondering about temporary files, although I suppose 100G worth
> of temp files is a bit much for this query.  But you need to watch df
> while the query is happening, rather than suppose that an after-the-fact
> reading means anything.

Anytime we get an out of space error we will be in the same situation.

When we get this error, we should
* summary of current temp file usage
* df (if possible on OS)

Otherwise we'll always be wondering what caused the error.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to