Tom Lane escribió: > Hmm, maybe we need to improve the code too. This example suggests that > there needs to be some limit on the worker launch rate, even if there > are so many databases that that means we don't meet naptime exactly.
We already have a 100ms lower bound on the sleep time (see launcher_determine_sleep()). Maybe that needs to be increased? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
