On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> You can't "turn off" sequential scans.  You can only make the planner
> less likely to choose them.  But if there's no way to get the data you
> need other than a seqscan, it's still going to do one.

And that's not a bad thing.  For a very small table, it's often the
fastest method.

...Robert

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to