On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > And maybe REINDEX, too.
yup, nevermind the mess in table, indices are getting fscked much quicker than table it self, because of its structure. -- GJ
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > And maybe REINDEX, too.
yup, nevermind the mess in table, indices are getting fscked much quicker than table it self, because of its structure. -- GJ