On Saturday 12 December 2009 21:38:41 Andres Freund wrote:
> On Saturday 12 December 2009 21:36:27 Michael Clemmons wrote:
> > If ppl think its worth it I'll create a ticket
> Thanks, no need. I will post a patch tomorrow or so.
Well. It was a long day...

Anyway.
In this patch I delay the fsync done in copy_file and simply do a second pass 
over the directory in copy_dir and fsync everything in that pass.
Including the directory - which was not done before and actually might be 
necessary in some cases.
I added a posix_fadvise(..., FADV_DONTNEED) to make it more likely that the 
copied file reaches storage before the fsync. Without the speed benefits were 
quite a bit smaller and essentially random (which seems sensible).

This speeds up CREATE DATABASE from ~9 seconds to something around 0.8s on my 
laptop.  Still slower than with fsync off (~0.25) but quite a worthy 
improvement.

The benefits are obviously bigger if the template database includes anything 
added.


Andres

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to