Dave Crooke <dcro...@gmail.com> writes:
> This is the second time I've heard that "PG shared buffer on Windows doesn't
> matter" ... I'd like to understand the reasoning behind that claim, and why
> it differs from other DB servers.
AFAIK we don't really understand why, but the experimental evidence is
that increasing shared_buffers to really large values doesn't help much
on Windows. You can probably find more in the archives.
I'm not sure that this has been retested recently, so it might be
obsolete information, but it's what we've got.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
