On 01/19/10 14:36, fka...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ivan Voras:
[I just skimmed this thread - did you increase the number of WAL logs to
something very large, like 128?]
Yes, I tried even more.
I will be writing data quite constantly in the real scenario
later. So I wonder if increasing WAL logs will have a
positive effect or not: AFAIK when I increase it, the
duration after the max is hit will be longer then (which is
not acceptable in my case).
Could anyone confirm if I got it right?
It seems so - if you are writing constantly then you will probably get
lower but more long-term-stable performance from a smaller number of WAL
logs.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
