Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Hmm, in that case, I think the problem is that this function has no > comment explaining its intended charter.
That's certainly a big problem, but a comment won't fix the fact that
the name is misleading. We need both a comment and a name change.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
