Christiaan Willemsen wrote:
So I was thinking: Why not make a big fat array using 14 disks (raid 1, 10 or 5), and make this a big and fast swap disk. Latency will be lower than the SAN can provide, and throughput will also be better, and it will relief the SAN from a lot of read iops.
Presuming that swap will give predictable performance as things go into and out of there doesn't sound like a great idea to me. Have you considered adding that space as a tablespace and setting temp_tablespaces to point to it? That's the best thing I can think of to use a faster local disk with lower integrity guarantees for.
-- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support g...@2ndquadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
