Scott Marlowe <[email protected]> writes: > So, Tom, so you think it's possible that the planner isn't noticing > all those nulls and thinks it'll just take a row or two to get to the > value it needs to join on?
Could be. I don't have time right now to chase through the code, but
that sounds like a plausible theory.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
