Tom Lane wrote:
> Dimitri Fontaine <dfonta...@hi-media.com> writes:
> > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes:
> >> a) Eliminate WAL logging entirely
If we elimiate WAL logging, that means a reinstall is required for even
a postmaster crash, which is a new non-durable behavior.
Also, we just added wal_level = minimal, which might end up being a poor
name choice of we want wal_level = off in PG 9.1. Perhaps we should
have used wal_level = crash_safe in 9.0.
I have added the following TODO:
Consider a non-crash-safe wal_level that eliminates WAL activity
*
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-06/msg00300.php
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
