Otherwise I'm wondering if PostgreSQL will begin really suffering in performance on workloads where queries are big and expensive but there are relatively few of them running at a time.
Oh, I should note at this point that I'm *not* whining that "someone" should volunteer to do this, or that "the postgresql project" should just "make it happen".
I'm fully aware that Pg is a volunteer project and that even if these speculations were in a vaguely reasonable direction, that doesn't mean anyone has the time/skills/knowledge/interest to undertake such major architectural change. I certainly know I have zero right to ask/expect anyone to - I'm very, very grateful to all those who already spend time helping out and enhancing Pg. With particular props to Tom Lane for patience on the -general list and heroic bug-fixing persistence.
Sorry for the rely-to-self, I just realized my post could've been taken as a whine about Pg's architecture and some kind of demand that someone do something about it. That couldn't be further from my intent.
-- Craig Ringer -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
