Andres Freund wrote:
A new checkpointing logic + a new syncing logic (prepare_fsync() earlier and then fsync() later) would be a nice thing. Do you plan to work on that?
The background writer already caches fsync calls into a queue, so the prepare step you're thinking needs to be there is already. The problem is that the actual fsync calls happen in a tight loop. That we're busy fixing.
-- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support g...@2ndquadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
