|
Hi, The plan improves. So can you explain why? Thanks in advance. Kaloyan QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..82.88 rows=1 width=68) (actual time=92.455..92.455 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..77.73 rows=1 width=64) (actual time=92.453..92.453 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..69.44 rows=1 width=64) (actual time=92.451..92.451 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..64.26 rows=1 width=60) (actual time=92.449..92.449 rows=0 loops=1) Join Filter: (dd.measure_id = m.measure_id) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..62.95 rows=1 width=60) (actual time=92.447..92.447 rows=0 loops=1) Join Filter: (dd.serviceid = s.serviceid) -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..59.96 rows=1 width=37) (actual time=92.444..92.444 rows=0 loops=1) Join Filter: (dom.domain_type_id = dt.id) -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..58.13 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=92.443..92.443 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..52.88 rows=1 width=28) (actual time=92.440..92.440 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..27.50 rows=5 width=16) (actual time=0.021..0.027 rows=1 loops=1) -> Index Scan using proforms_person1_id_idx on proforms p (cost=0.00..10.67 rows=2 width=4) (actual time=0.008..0.009 rows=1 loops=1) Index Cond: (person1_id = 287294) -> Index Scan using acc_debts_pno_idx on acc_debts add (cost=0.00..8.38 rows=3 width=16) (actual time=0.007..0.009 rows=1 loops=1) Index Cond: (add.pno = p.pno) Filter: (NOT add.credit) -> Index Scan using debts_desc_pkey on debts_desc dd (cost=0.00..5.06 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=92.408..92.408 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (dd.debtid = add.debtid) Filter: (dd.active AND (NOT dd.paid) AND dd.has_proform AND (NOT dd.storned)) -> Index Scan using domeini_pkey on domeini dom (cost=0.00..5.24 rows=1 width=16) (never executed) Index Cond: (dd.domain_id = dom.id) -> Seq Scan on domain_type dt (cost=0.00..1.37 rows=37 width=9) (never executed) -> Seq Scan on services s (cost=0.00..2.44 rows=44 width=31) (never executed) -> Seq Scan on measures m (cost=0.00..1.14 rows=14 width=8) (never executed) -> Index Scan using acc_debts_debtid_idx on acc_debts adc (cost=0.00..5.16 rows=1 width=8) (never executed) Index Cond: (dd.debtid = adc.debtid) Filter: adc.credit -> Index Scan using acc_clients_transact_no_uidx on acc_clients ac (cost=0.00..8.28 rows=1 width=8) (never executed) Index Cond: (ac.transact_no = adc.transact_no) Filter: (NOT ac.credit) -> Index Scan using invoices_ino_uidx on invoices i (cost=0.00..5.13 rows=1 width=8) (never executed) Index Cond: (ac.ino = i.ino) Total runtime: 92.612 ms (34 rows) Kevin Grittner wrote: Kaloyan Iliev Iliev <[email protected]> wrote: |
- [PERFORM] Question about LEFT JOIN and query plan Kaloyan Iliev Iliev
- Re: [PERFORM] Question about LEFT JOIN and query ... Tom Lane
- Re: [PERFORM] Question about LEFT JOIN and qu... Kaloyan Iliev Iliev
- Re: [PERFORM] Question about LEFT JOIN an... Kaloyan Iliev Iliev
- Re: [PERFORM] Question about LEFT JOI... Kevin Grittner
- Re: [PERFORM] Question about LEFT JOIN and query ... Kevin Grittner
- Re: [PERFORM] Question about LEFT JOIN and qu... Kaloyan Iliev Iliev
- Re: [PERFORM] Question about LEFT JOIN an... Kevin Grittner
