On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>wrote:
> Excerpts from Samuel Gendler's message of sáb oct 16 02:35:46 -0300 2010: > > > An issue with automatically analyzing the entire hierarchy is 'abstract' > > table definitions. I've got a set of tables for storing the same data at > > different granularities of aggregation. Within each granularity, I've > got > > partitions, but because the set of columns is identical for each > > granularity, I've got an abstract table definition that is inherited by > > everything. I don't need or want statistics kept on that table because I > > never query across the abstract table, only the parent table of each > > aggregation granularity > > Hmm, I think you'd be better served by using LIKE instead of regular > inheritance. > > Yep. I inherited the architecture, though, and changing it hasn't been a high priority. --sam
