2010/10/28 Trenta sis <trenta....@gmail.com>: > > > There are about 100.000 inserts and 300000 updates. Without transaction it > seems that works, but with a transaction no. Witt about only 300.000 updates > it seems that can finish correctly, but last 20% is slow because is using > swap... > > Any tunning to do in this configuration or it is correct?
You should post your queries, and tables definitions involved. > > thanks > > 2010/10/28 Craig Ringer <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> >> >> On 10/28/2010 02:38 AM, Trenta sis wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a Linux Server (Debian) with Postgres 8.3 and I have problems >>> with a massive update, about 400000 updates/inserts. >>> If I execute about 100000 it seems all ok, but when I execute 400000, I >>> have the same problem with or without a transaction (I need to do with a >>> transaction) increase memory usage and disk usage. >>> With a execution of 400.000 inserts/update server begin woring well, but >>> after 100 seconds of executions increase usage of RAM, and then Swap and >>> finally all RAM and swap are used and execution can't finish. >> >> Do you have lots of triggers on the table? Or foreign key relationships >> that're DEFERRABLE ? >> >> -- >> Craig Ringer > > > -- Cédric Villemain 2ndQuadrant http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
